Prediction of Kamil Majchrzak [91st] vs Sumit Nagal [171st] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W W W W W
Form
L L L W L W L W W LHead-To-Head: Majchrzak 2 - 1 Nagal
They have played 6 sets in total, with Majchrzak winning 4 and Nagal winning 2. The last match between Majchrzak and Nagal was at the Grand Prix Hassan II - Marrakech, 31-03-2025, Q3, Clay with Kamil Majchrzak getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kamil Majchrzak | 2 |
| Sumit Nagal | 1 |
| Majchrzak | Stats | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| 77% (20-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (8-10) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 91 | Ranking | 171 |
| 75 | Highest Rank | 68 |
| 29 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 19 | Titles | 15 |
| 65% (416-227) | Career Total W/L | 59% (339-233) |
| $1,059,510 | Career Prize Money | $534,520 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Sumit Nagal
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 32 | Games Won | 20 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:22:32 | Average Match Time | 1:22:32 |
| 61% (98/160) | 1st Serve % | 64% (116/181) |
| 71% (70/98) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (69/116) |
| 48% (30/62) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (24/65) |
| 34% (12/35) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (6/15) |
| 49% (88/181) | Return Points Win % | 38% (60/160) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kamil Majchrzak vs Sumit Nagal Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Majchrzak 2 - 1 Nagal
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Majchrzak has won 42.9% of points on their second serve, while Nagal has won 42.69%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Majchrzak, in recent form, has won 44.48% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nagal has won 46.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.06% and 29.55% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Majchrzak has saved 57.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nagal has saved 52.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Majchrzak has won 71.43% of matches played (W/L 50/ 20), with Nagal winning 42% (W/L 21/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Majchrzak has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 245/ 121), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 41/ 35). Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 232/ 140), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Majchrzak has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 73.47% of matches (W/L 36/ 13), where as Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 14/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Majchrzak winning 2 times and Nagal being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Majchrzak winning 4 and Nagal winning 2. The last match between Majchrzak and Nagal was at the Grand Prix Hassan II - Marrakech, 31-03-2025, Q3, Clay with Kamil Majchrzak getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:32.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Majchrzak and Nagal have played a deciding set 0 times, with Majchrzak winning 0 times and Nagal 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Majchrzak winning 0, and Nagal 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Majchrzak has played against opponents with an average rank of 189.36 while Nagal has played against players with an average rank of 203.12.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Majchrzak has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nagal has won 77% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Majchrzak has converted 26.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nagal has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Kamil Majchrzak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Hugo Dellien
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Marin Cilic
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
4
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
27 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Norbert Gombos
69%
(
84 of
121)
1st Serve %
72%
(
79 of
110)
11
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
44 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
110)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
114)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
83)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
114)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(10) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Carlos Taberner
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Alexandre Muller
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
54)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
20 of
23)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
70%
(
16 of
23)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
35
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Federico Iannaccone
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Ergi Kirkin
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
82 of
124)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
46 of
82)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
124)
124
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Amine Jamji
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Sumit Nagal
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve %
84%
(
27 of
32)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Sumit Nagal
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
80%
(
41 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Sumit Nagal
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Sumit Nagal
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
87)
76
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-6(5) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Majchrzak vs Nagal?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Majchrzak Vs Nagal is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (416/227) | Win/Loss | 59% (339/233) |
| 62% (929/566) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (773/561) |
| 55% (7713/6274) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (6537/5748) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 2294 | Aces Total | 782 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1150 | Total Double Faults | 1233 |
| 1:19:49 | Average Match Time | 1:32:47 |
| 185.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 228.87 |
| 59% (22536/37974) | 1st Serve % | 68% (23791/35192) |
| 71% (15986/22536) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (15298/23791) |
| 52% (8061/15436) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5746/11387) |
| 45% (1815/4056) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1844/4176) |
| 41% (15894/38349) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15480/36169) |
| 66% (403/607) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (330/549) |
| 28% (7/25) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (4/16) |
| 55% (109/199) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (84/145) |
| 52% (96/184) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (87/178) |
| 89% (422/374) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (354/299) |
| 11% (422/47) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (354/53) |
| 19% (221/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (218/40) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
